A mobile operating system has now become one of the most considered because of the many options available today, ranging from Windows Mobile, IOS, Bada, BlackBerry, Symbian, until Android. At first Windows Mobile operating system is the mainstay of a high end smartphone which is then called a PDA. Rival Palm was the only practical but far less than the interface, compatibility, and support the application. Once it started to pour Nokia handphone line that uses the Symbian OS. Both become the largest market share as the operating system that is injected in a smartphone.
The question is, as a long-developed OS, why then in such a short time eliminated by the new OS come from? What is the difference in Windows Mobile and Symbian OS to another OS is far more desirable? Is not it supposed to in the research and development is always running and will continue to follow the trend of users and Innovation has always been required to anticipate all the needs and progress there.
Like for example Windows OS on a smartphone is a Pocket PC that originally 2000/Rapier, which was introduced in April 2000, or Symbian that began to emerge during concurrent, to within the next 12 years until now it's almost been progressing very slowly. I think there are two things that really affect it, namely:
A. Because the application service support Windows Mobile and Symbian grow slowly, things are very different in comparison with direct competitors OS provides support for applications with a number in the tens of thousands in a short time. For example, IOS with App Store, Android Market, BlackBerry App Worldnya. Could this be forgotten terfikirkan of their parties or did not think it would be the most decisive factor in the popularity of an OS. Provision Apps on Windows Mobile Marketplace and the Ovi Store to be a step too late though not with vanity vanity and wither before it develops.
2. Interface or use an interface that is used both of them almost no significant change at all. If only Windows Mobile and Symbian are comparable, then the use of Symbian will look simple, friendly, and requires fast adjustments. But now it is not a measure. Instead use the Windows and Symbian looks annoying, beribet, and it just seems that when compared to other emerging OS.
Now, we are just waiting for the breakthrough of the two who reportedly collaborated to seize the cake back up the depleted eroded by emerging OS. Without a massive change in the service interface application and it will be very difficult to materialize. If not, then we just say goodbye to both.
The question is, as a long-developed OS, why then in such a short time eliminated by the new OS come from? What is the difference in Windows Mobile and Symbian OS to another OS is far more desirable? Is not it supposed to in the research and development is always running and will continue to follow the trend of users and Innovation has always been required to anticipate all the needs and progress there.
Like for example Windows OS on a smartphone is a Pocket PC that originally 2000/Rapier, which was introduced in April 2000, or Symbian that began to emerge during concurrent, to within the next 12 years until now it's almost been progressing very slowly. I think there are two things that really affect it, namely:
A. Because the application service support Windows Mobile and Symbian grow slowly, things are very different in comparison with direct competitors OS provides support for applications with a number in the tens of thousands in a short time. For example, IOS with App Store, Android Market, BlackBerry App Worldnya. Could this be forgotten terfikirkan of their parties or did not think it would be the most decisive factor in the popularity of an OS. Provision Apps on Windows Mobile Marketplace and the Ovi Store to be a step too late though not with vanity vanity and wither before it develops.
2. Interface or use an interface that is used both of them almost no significant change at all. If only Windows Mobile and Symbian are comparable, then the use of Symbian will look simple, friendly, and requires fast adjustments. But now it is not a measure. Instead use the Windows and Symbian looks annoying, beribet, and it just seems that when compared to other emerging OS.
Now, we are just waiting for the breakthrough of the two who reportedly collaborated to seize the cake back up the depleted eroded by emerging OS. Without a massive change in the service interface application and it will be very difficult to materialize. If not, then we just say goodbye to both.
RSS Feed